SC to pronounce order on ban on women's entry in Sabarimala temple

The court is hearing a PIL filed in 2006 by non-profit body Indian Young Lawyers’ Association seeking entry for all women and girls to the Sabarimala shrine

As the Supreme Court is set to pronounce its verdict on ban on women's entry into Kerala's Sabarimala Temple, women right activist on Friday expressed hope for a positive and landmark judgment in the matter.

The bench of Justice Dipak Misra, Justice R. Banumathi and Justice Ashok Bhushan had earlier reserved its verdict on referring the case to a constitution bench.

The court is hearing a plea challenging practice of banning entry of such women in the temple. In November previous year, after the Left government took charge in Kerala, there was a U-turn by the state government from its earlier stance and the affidavit stated that it was ready to allow women of all ages to enter Sabarimala.

The apex court also framed a question about whether restricting the entry of women at the temple was violative of their rights under the Constitution. If so, should their privilege to manage their religious affairs yield to the fundamental right of women to practice religion freely.

Noting that this is not the first time that the Kerala government has changed its stand, the court asked the state to "unequivocally clarify its position".

In 2008, the LDF government had filed an affidavit before the apex court supporting the entry of women of all age groups to Sabarimala, which bars women of menstruating age.

One of the questions by the apex court is also if restricting the entry of women violates their rights under the Constitution and amounted to discrimination against them. This customary ban had been codified in Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965.

The Bench had even indicated that the 1991 judgment of the High Court, upholding the restriction on women, was no bar on a Constitution Bench from deciding the issue afresh. You can not refuse entry to a woman who comes there ...

In 2014, the Congress-led government said there was a "mistake" in its own submissions to court earlier and that women can not be permitted in the temple because of the deity's celibacy vows.

The court is hearing a PIL filed in 2006 by non-profit body Indian Young Lawyers' Association, seeking entry for all women and girls to the Sabarimala shrine.

Related:

Comments

Latest news

London’s Medical Startups Challenge Welcomes a New Judge, Max Polyakov
MBios is a joint project of Innovation House and the Ukrainian Medical Association of the United Kingdom (UMAUK). Such kind of challenges provides the participants with an opportunity to present their projects to the world.

Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) Position Increased by Wells Fargo & Company MN
Wells Fargo & Company MN's holdings in Smith & Nephew plc were worth $13,285,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC. Also, there are 0 buy, 0 sell and 0 strong sell ratings, collectively assigning a 1.67 average brokerage recommendation.

Newmont Mining Corporation (NYSE:NEM) Broker Price Targets For The Coming Week
Currently, 275.41 million total shares are owned by the public and among those 273.41 million shares have been available to trade. Cullen Mgmt Ltd Liability Co holds 23,200 shares or 0.03% of its portfolio. 12,027 were reported by Advisor Ptnrs Ltd Liability.

China's September trade with US, EU and key nations
China's August exports were up 5.5 percent from a year ago in dollar terms, while imports were up 13.3 percent in dollar terms. The trade surplus totaled USD28.47 billion in September versus the expected surplus of USD38.0 billion.

The MARVEL Role JEFF GOLDBLUM Didn't Take
Suffice to say, the actor goes full Goldblum in the upcoming film, and it's sure to be an absolute delight. In an interview with UPROXX , Feige was asked if there were any actors that he had been unable to land.

Other news